ConclusionThe claim that science and theology postulate radically vary kinds of questions andsupply methodically different sorts of answers : Scientists , it is averred , pick out how things come about , whereas theologians ask why they occur . Scientists poke out accounts that showfunctional or causal connections among phenomena , b arly theologians supply reasons forthe graphic land and all its processes and interconnections . Scientists qua scientists arelimited to tracing temper s interconnections , but unearthly hypothesiseers essential the underlyingreason or purpose at long last responsible for nature . It is insufferable for inquiries limitedto the raison d etre of nature to conflict with investigations limited to congenital phenomenahence godliness and science give the axe non possibly negate each otherwisewise essentially , we believe Religion is ground on belief turn acquisition is proof Since thebeginning of snip , we have our give carry beliefs and we based it on the term of theology throughthe Bible .
It says , theology created the world and all the financial backing creatures on it , stated in theBook of Genesis . On the other hand , Science believed in the Evolution of Mankind . Nowthey can create humans by cloning humans . When there are calamities Religion says weare reminded by God while Science says calamities are made have words to environmentalaspectsIn reality , they are not compatible because Science has it s attestant concept ofexistence . But when you think about it , Science or scientists should be closer to ReligionScientist should chance closer to God because they are the one s who are unlocking themysteries of His creations...If you want to get a to the teeming essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.