Professional Ethics

1 . Case : Dr . Conrad Hadenuf has been a cleard psychologist for 20 geezerhood and has continuously maintained a busy form . He sees a wide variety of clients . As a chassis of emancipation re advancedal , he is indispensable to attend a 15 hour retraining program o content vilification . He is indignant . `I have a Ph .D , I have 3 ,000 hours of supervised experienced , and I have years of experience with all sorts of problems , he says . `This is only a money-making gimmick for those who want to generate workshops !` perspicacious that he has no choice if he wants to retain his license , Conrad grudgingly attends the workshop , sits in the back of the room , takes no notes , takes all-night breaks the scheduled , and leaves soon as the certificates of attendance ar available-Do you envisage it is honest to take plac e practicing if you do not slide by your pedagogy ? Why or wherefore notIt is definitely not ethical to continue practicing if the occupational does not continue his /her grooming as mandated by the righteousness . The law has stipulated this requirement for some(prenominal) profound and crucial reasons The master has to go through this in for him /her to be reminded of the changes that argon sure to have occurred in the rehearse of his /her profession from the amendments of existing laws , and notifications of offenses that are becoming common and how to retain or avoid this to happen to the licensed psychologist . In Dr . Hadenuf s typeface , his bearing during the program is considered an affront to the standards and what are supposed to be upheld in the practice . When a practitioner does not harmonize with what has been provided by the law , as in this particular typeface , that psyche has violated the ethics of the practice in unhomogeneous ways .

The individual shows that he /she does not respect the law , the needs that are obviously being addressed why this law is excuse being implemented , and sets precedence on other dilettante individual practitioners to follow-Should evidence of continuing education be undeniable (or simply strongly recommended ) as a basis for recertification or relicensureEvidence of continuing education should be indispensable and not retributive strongly recommended for every professional as basis for recertification or relicensure . As stated in the forego statements , there are strong realistic , practical and ethical reasons why this is required to all who are in the practice . It will be presumptive for anybody , no matter his top and accomplishm ents , to maintain that he /she has no need of such . It is a healthy and evidential assumption that all people in whatever professional endeavor go through disintegrate and compromises and constant monitor , refresher on his practice must(prenominal) substantiate these occasions-What kind of continuing education would you want for yourself ? by means of what means do you think you can best build up new skills and keep abreast of advances in your field2 . Go to hypertext transfer communications protocol /www .tcada .state .tx .us /sanctions /counselor .shtml-Of those , what are the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay